A party wall separates two properties — and Malaysian law under UBBL 1984, Act 133 and the Strata Management Act 2013 sets out who owns it, who repairs it, and what happens when a neighbour hacks or damages it.
This guide provides general legal information only — not legal advice. Consult a qualified Malaysian property lawyer for your specific situation.
Under UBBL 1984 By-law 86, a party wall is defined as a wall that forms part of a building and is used, or constructed to be used, for the separation of adjoining buildings belonging to different owners — whether the wall stands astride or immediately abutts a common lot boundary (Source: UBBL 1984, Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan (KPKT)).
In Malaysia, party walls are most commonly found in:
Ownership depends on the type of title:
| Property type | Party wall ownership | Governing law |
|---|---|---|
| Landed (terrace, semi-D) — individual title | Each owner owns the half of the wall on their side of the centre line, or as determined by the lot boundary on the title plan | National Land Code 1965; UBBL 1984 By-law 86 |
| Strata (condo, apartment) | If the wall is common property per the strata plan: owned and maintained by the JMB/MC. If it is within a parcel boundary: owned by the parcel owner | SMA 2013 (Act 757); Strata Titles Act 1985 (Act 318) |
| Shophouse / commercial terrace | Similar to landed; check the individual title plan and any covenants | NLC; UBBL 1984 |
In practice, both adjoining owners of a terrace party wall typically share a common law right of support — neither can do anything that would weaken the structural integrity of the wall or deny the other owner the support the wall provides (Source: hajimohamadzainuddin.com, Nuisance and Trespass in Malaysia).
Several laws govern party walls simultaneously (Source: KPKT; AGC Malaysia; MahWengKwai & Associates, Inter-Floor Leakage & Party Wall Damage in Strata Schemes):
| Law | Relevance to party walls |
|---|---|
| UBBL 1984 By-law 86 | Defines party wall; sets construction and fire-resistance standards |
| Act 133 (Street, Drainage & Building Act 1974) s.70 | Any alteration to a party wall requires local-authority building plan approval; offence to alter without approval |
| SMA 2013 (Act 757) s.32; Regs 2015 Reg 56 & 67 | Strata by-laws bind both owners; COB adjudicates party wall damage in strata schemes |
| National Land Code 1965 | Encroachment across lot boundary; trespass to land |
| Common law torts (nuisance, negligence, trespass) | Civil claim for damage caused by unauthorised works on a party wall |
For strata buildings, the Strata Management (Maintenance and Management) Regulations 2015 add specific rules about party walls (Source: MahWengKwai & Associates, Inter-Floor Leakage & Party Wall Damage in Strata Schemes; KPKT COB guidelines; Regulations 56 and 67):
Failure to obtain both management approval and local-authority approval is a dual breach: of the strata by-laws and of Act 133.
One of the most common disputes is who pays for repairing a party wall. Here is how responsibility is generally determined:
| Cause of damage | Who is responsible | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Normal wear and tear (old age, weathering) | Both owners share the cost proportionally | Common law right of support; UBBL 1984 |
| One owner’s renovation hacked or weakened the wall | The owner who caused the damage | Negligence; strata by-law breach; Act 133 s.70 offence if no permit |
| Strata party wall (common property) defect | JMB/MC out of maintenance fund | SMA 2013 ss.21, 59 |
| Structural defect during defect liability period | Developer | Housing Development Act 1966 (HDA); SPA contract |
| Damage by contractor engaged by neighbour | The contracting owner (they are responsible for their contractor) | Negligence; agency principles |
The short answer: always, for any structural or material alteration. Specifically, you must obtain:
Even minor works such as chasing a channel into the wall for new electrical conduit should be declared to management (strata) and to your neighbour, as vibration and hacking can cause unexpected cracking on the adjacent side.
If your neighbour hacks, thins, or structurally alters the party wall without obtaining your consent or the required approvals, they have committed multiple breaches simultaneously:
Your remedies are:
The Commissioner of Buildings (COB) is the enforcement authority for the SMA 2013 and is attached to your local council (e.g. DBKL, MBPJ, MPAJ). For party wall damage in a strata scheme, the COB route under Regulations 56 & 67 is free, relatively fast, and does not require a lawyer. File a written complaint containing:
The COB may direct the responsible owner to carry out rectification and can impose fines under the SMA 2013 for non-compliance (Source: KPKT; ezrilaw.com, Commissioner of Buildings (COB) Explained).
If COB action does not result in adequate rectification, or if you need a formal compensation order, file at the Strata Management Tribunal (SMT) via strata.my or in person at the relevant COB office. The Tribunal can order the offending owner to pay your full repair costs plus consequential losses, up to RM250,000 (Source: MahWengKwai & Associates, 10 Things to Know About the Strata Management Tribunal). Awards are issued within 60 days and have the force of a court order.
For more on the Tribunal process, see Strata Management Tribunal Guide →.
For damage caused by structural hacking specifically, also see Unauthorised Structural Hacking →.
Need advice on repairing a wall damaged by a neighbour’s renovation? WhatsApp ClickBina →
Tell us what you need — we reply within the hour.